Portugal vs South Asia: Services, value added per worker

Portugal
43,284 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
South Asia
9,242 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Portugal rank
33rd
South Asia rank
30th

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Portugal
  • South Asia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120082025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 43,284 constant 2015 US$ against 9,242 constant 2015 US$ in South Asia, a difference of 34,042 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Portugal's figure about 4.7 times South Asia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 33rd and South Asia ranks 30th of 176 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal South Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 37,055 constant 2015 US$ 3,406 constant 2015 US$ 33,649 constant 2015 US$ Portugal
2000s 39,735 constant 2015 US$ 4,373 constant 2015 US$ 35,363 constant 2015 US$ Portugal
2010s 40,451 constant 2015 US$ 6,687 constant 2015 US$ 33,764 constant 2015 US$ Portugal
2020s 41,747 constant 2015 US$ 8,387 constant 2015 US$ 33,360 constant 2015 US$ Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Portugal or South Asia?
Portugal, at 43,284 constant 2015 US$ against 9,242 constant 2015 US$ in South Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Portugal and South Asia?
34,042 constant 2015 US$, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and South Asia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Portugal and South Asia rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Portugal ranks 33rd and South Asia ranks 30th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs South Asia: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/portugal/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/portugal/south-asia/">Portugal vs South Asia: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.