Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added per worker

Papua New Guinea
6,587 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Zimbabwe
6,102 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
131st
Zimbabwe rank
132nd

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199120082025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 6,587 constant 2015 US$ against 6,102 constant 2015 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 485 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 4,852 constant 2015 US$ 4,738 constant 2015 US$ 114.05 constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 5,628 constant 2015 US$ 8,384 constant 2015 US$ 2,756 constant 2015 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 6,266 constant 2015 US$ 6,128 constant 2015 US$ 138.64 constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 6,587 constant 2015 US$ against 6,102 constant 2015 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
485 constant 2015 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Papua New Guinea ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.