Hong Kong vs OECD members: Services, value added per worker

Hong Kong
99,420 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
OECD members
63,290 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
7th
OECD members rank
3rd

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Hong Kong
  • OECD members
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199520102025

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 99,420 constant 2015 US$ against 63,290 constant 2015 US$ in OECD members, a difference of 36,130 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.6 times OECD members's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 3rd of 176 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong OECD members Difference Ahead
2000s 68,610 constant 2015 US$ 59,894 constant 2015 US$ 8,715 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong
2010s 86,063 constant 2015 US$ 62,386 constant 2015 US$ 23,677 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong
2020s 92,762 constant 2015 US$ 62,513 constant 2015 US$ 30,249 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Hong Kong or OECD members?
Hong Kong, at 99,420 constant 2015 US$ against 63,290 constant 2015 US$ in OECD members as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Hong Kong and OECD members?
36,130 constant 2015 US$, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and OECD members?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and OECD members rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Hong Kong ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 3rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs OECD members: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong vs OECD members: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.