Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Services, value added per worker

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
3,822 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Lithuania
34,126 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
44th
Lithuania rank
46th

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
010.0k20.0k30.0k199120082025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 34,126 constant 2015 US$ against 3,822 constant 2015 US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 30,304 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 8.9 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 46th of 45 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 3,196 constant 2015 US$ 15,822 constant 2015 US$ 12,626 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2000s 3,495 constant 2015 US$ 22,651 constant 2015 US$ 19,156 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2010s 3,814 constant 2015 US$ 27,835 constant 2015 US$ 24,021 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2020s 3,814 constant 2015 US$ 32,722 constant 2015 US$ 28,907 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 34,126 constant 2015 US$ against 3,822 constant 2015 US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
30,304 constant 2015 US$, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 46th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.