Europe & Central Asia vs Luxembourg: Services, value added per worker

Europe & Central Asia
58,660 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Luxembourg
187,012 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia rank
4th
Luxembourg rank
1st

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Luxembourg
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199120082025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 187,012 constant 2015 US$ against 58,660 constant 2015 US$ in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 128,352 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 3.2 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 44 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 45,570 constant 2015 US$ 202,692 constant 2015 US$ 157,122 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2000s 48,552 constant 2015 US$ 229,141 constant 2015 US$ 180,589 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2010s 50,617 constant 2015 US$ 211,879 constant 2015 US$ 161,263 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2020s 55,128 constant 2015 US$ 195,735 constant 2015 US$ 140,608 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Europe & Central Asia or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 187,012 constant 2015 US$ against 58,660 constant 2015 US$ in Europe & Central Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Europe & Central Asia and Luxembourg?
128,352 constant 2015 US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Luxembourg?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Luxembourg rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Luxembourg: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/europe-and-central-asia/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/europe-and-central-asia/luxembourg/">Europe & Central Asia vs Luxembourg: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.