East Asia & Pacific vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added per worker

East Asia & Pacific
28,384 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
99,420 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
11th
Hong Kong, China rank
7th

Services, value added per worker over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Hong Kong, China
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199120082025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 99,420 constant 2015 US$ against 28,384 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 71,036 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 3.5 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 7th of 46 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 19,829 constant 2015 US$ 68,610 constant 2015 US$ 48,780 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 24,091 constant 2015 US$ 86,063 constant 2015 US$ 61,973 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 28,930 constant 2015 US$ 93,872 constant 2015 US$ 64,942 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, East Asia & Pacific or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 99,420 constant 2015 US$ against 28,384 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between East Asia & Pacific and Hong Kong, China?
71,036 constant 2015 US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Hong Kong, China rank globally for services, value added per worker?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 7th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/east-asia-and-pacific/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/east-asia-and-pacific/hong-kong-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.