Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macau, China: Services, value added per worker

Central Europe and the Baltics
34,800 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Macau, China
121,145 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
7th
Macau, China rank
4th

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Macau, China
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199520102025

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 121,145 constant 2015 US$ against 34,800 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 86,345 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 3.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th and Macau, China ranks 4th of 46 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 25,760 constant 2015 US$ 102,202 constant 2015 US$ 76,442 constant 2015 US$ Macau, China
2010s 27,545 constant 2015 US$ 147,540 constant 2015 US$ 119,995 constant 2015 US$ Macau, China
2020s 32,873 constant 2015 US$ 88,202 constant 2015 US$ 55,329 constant 2015 US$ Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Central Europe and the Baltics or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 121,145 constant 2015 US$ against 34,800 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2024.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Central Europe and the Baltics and Macau, China?
86,345 constant 2015 US$, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Macau, China?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Macau, China rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th and Macau, China ranks 4th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macau, China: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/macao-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macau, China: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.