Caribbean Small States vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added per worker

Caribbean Small States
30,326 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
99,420 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Caribbean Small States rank
10th
Hong Kong, China rank
7th

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Caribbean Small States
  • Hong Kong, China
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199120082025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 99,420 constant 2015 US$ against 30,326 constant 2015 US$ in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 69,094 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 3.3 times Caribbean Small States's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Caribbean Small States ranks 10th and Hong Kong, China ranks 7th of 46 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Small States Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 27,852 constant 2015 US$ 68,610 constant 2015 US$ 40,758 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 29,858 constant 2015 US$ 86,063 constant 2015 US$ 56,206 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 29,106 constant 2015 US$ 92,762 constant 2015 US$ 63,656 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Caribbean Small States or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 99,420 constant 2015 US$ against 30,326 constant 2015 US$ in Caribbean Small States as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Caribbean Small States and Hong Kong, China?
69,094 constant 2015 US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and Hong Kong, China?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Caribbean Small States and Hong Kong, China rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Caribbean Small States ranks 10th and Hong Kong, China ranks 7th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean Small States vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/caribbean-small-states/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/caribbean-small-states/hong-kong-sar-china/">Caribbean Small States vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.