Australia vs East Asia & Pacific: Services, value added per worker

Australia
104,665 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific
28,384 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Australia rank
6th
East Asia & Pacific rank
9th

Services, value added per worker over time

  • Australia
  • East Asia & Pacific
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199120082025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 104,665 constant 2015 US$ against 28,384 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 76,281 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 3.7 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 6th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 9th of 176 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia East Asia & Pacific Difference Ahead
1990s 79,097 constant 2015 US$ 14,285 constant 2015 US$ 64,812 constant 2015 US$ Australia
2000s 93,452 constant 2015 US$ 19,829 constant 2015 US$ 73,623 constant 2015 US$ Australia
2010s 99,503 constant 2015 US$ 24,091 constant 2015 US$ 75,413 constant 2015 US$ Australia
2020s 102,539 constant 2015 US$ 28,930 constant 2015 US$ 73,609 constant 2015 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added per worker, Australia or East Asia & Pacific?
Australia, at 104,665 constant 2015 US$ against 28,384 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added per worker between Australia and East Asia & Pacific?
76,281 constant 2015 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and East Asia & Pacific?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Australia and East Asia & Pacific rank globally for services, value added per worker?
Australia ranks 6th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 9th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs East Asia & Pacific: Services, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/australia/east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/australia/east-asia-and-pacific/">Australia vs East Asia & Pacific: Services, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 7,068 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. The core indicator has been divided by the number of workers in the economy to derive a measure of labor productivity. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.