Cape Verde vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP

Cape Verde
0.6792 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.4297 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
43rd
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
46th

Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
00.20.40.60.8198020022025

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0.6792 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4297 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.2495 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 43rd and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 46th of 204 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1980s 0.6692 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3479 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3213 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
1990s 0.596 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4018 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1942 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
2000s 0.6935 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4084 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2852 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
2010s 0.6822 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4513 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2309 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
2020s 0.6819 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.439 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2429 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current us$), per unit of gdp, Cape Verde or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Cape Verde, at 0.6792 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4297 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added (current us$), per unit of gdp between Cape Verde and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
0.2495 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
43 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for services, value added (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Cape Verde ranks 43rd and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 46th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Cape Verde vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 10,748 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.