South Africa vs Tunisia: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

South Africa
197,217 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
192,663 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
122nd
Tunisia rank
123rd

Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Tunisia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 197,217 current US$ per square kilometre against 192,663 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 4,554 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 122nd and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 202 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 7,103 current US$ per square kilometre 3,563 current US$ per square kilometre 3,540 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 16,813 current US$ per square kilometre 11,005 current US$ per square kilometre 5,808 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 37,050 current US$ per square kilometre 24,217 current US$ per square kilometre 12,833 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 72,445 current US$ per square kilometre 52,726 current US$ per square kilometre 19,718 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 125,646 current US$ per square kilometre 114,225 current US$ per square kilometre 11,421 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 208,441 current US$ per square kilometre 171,685 current US$ per square kilometre 36,756 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 200,922 current US$ per square kilometre 178,566 current US$ per square kilometre 22,355 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, South Africa or Tunisia?
South Africa, at 197,217 current US$ per square kilometre against 192,663 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between South Africa and Tunisia?
4,554 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Tunisia rank globally for services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 122nd and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tunisia: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/tunisia/">South Africa vs Tunisia: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 10,141 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.