Côte d'Ivoire vs Gambia: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

Côte d'Ivoire
132,783 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
129,531 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire rank
138th
Gambia rank
140th

Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Gambia
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 132,783 current US$ per square kilometre against 129,531 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 3,252 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Gambia ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 138th and Gambia ranks 140th of 202 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Gambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,785 current US$ per square kilometre 2,602 current US$ per square kilometre 817.08 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 7,523 current US$ per square kilometre 6,437 current US$ per square kilometre 1,086 current US$ per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
1980s 13,944 current US$ per square kilometre 13,166 current US$ per square kilometre 778.08 current US$ per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
1990s 17,532 current US$ per square kilometre 46,648 current US$ per square kilometre 29,116 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 28,563 current US$ per square kilometre 53,548 current US$ per square kilometre 24,984 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 69,541 current US$ per square kilometre 78,164 current US$ per square kilometre 8,622 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 121,225 current US$ per square kilometre 113,401 current US$ per square kilometre 7,823 current US$ per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, Côte d'Ivoire or Gambia?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 132,783 current US$ per square kilometre against 129,531 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between Côte d'Ivoire and Gambia?
3,252 current US$ per square kilometre, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Gambia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Gambia rank globally for services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 138th and Gambia ranks 140th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Gambia: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/gambia-the/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Gambia: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 10,141 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.