China vs El Salvador: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

China
1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
974,160 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
64th
El Salvador rank
66th

Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • El Salvador
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre against 974,160 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 122,230 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was El Salvador ahead.

China ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 66th of 202 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 2,112 current US$ per square kilometre 17,266 current US$ per square kilometre 15,155 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre 36,049 current US$ per square kilometre 32,455 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 7,814 current US$ per square kilometre 88,870 current US$ per square kilometre 81,056 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 26,263 current US$ per square kilometre 217,383 current US$ per square kilometre 191,120 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 121,389 current US$ per square kilometre 423,061 current US$ per square kilometre 301,672 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 580,984 current US$ per square kilometre 661,896 current US$ per square kilometre 80,911 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 871,722 current US$ per square kilometre 157,968 current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, China or El Salvador?
China, at 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre against 974,160 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between China and El Salvador?
122,230 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and El Salvador?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do China and El Salvador rank globally for services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 66th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs El Salvador: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/">China vs El Salvador: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 10,141 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.