Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.23 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
331.58 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
4th
Hong Kong, China rank
4th

Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520092023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 331.58 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.23 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 330.36 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 270.4 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 47 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 434,260 current US$ per square kilometre 155.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 154.73 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 734,512 current US$ per square kilometre 257.80 million current US$ per square kilometre 257.07 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 312.89 million current US$ per square kilometre 311.84 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 331.58 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.23 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
330.36 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China rank globally for services, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 10,141 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.