Sint Maarten (Dutch part) vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
63.64 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of
61.02 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
40th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
42nd

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0M40.0M60.0M199020062023

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 63.64 million current LCU per square kilometre against 61.02 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 2.63 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 40th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 42nd of 202 countries.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2010s 55.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 42.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.33 million current LCU per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 60.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 59.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.46 million current LCU per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 63.64 million current LCU per square kilometre against 61.02 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2021.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2.63 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
How do Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 40th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 42nd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/sint-maarten-dutch-part/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/sint-maarten-dutch-part/tanzania/">Sint Maarten (Dutch part) vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.