North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

North Macedonia
20.38 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
19.88 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
76th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
77th

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196619942023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 20.38 million current LCU per square kilometre against 19.88 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 503,200 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 202 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 2.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.43 million current LCU per square kilometre 776,343 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 11.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 17.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.42 million current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 17.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 919,350 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, North Macedonia or Trinidad and Tobago?
North Macedonia, at 20.38 million current LCU per square kilometre against 19.88 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
503,200 current LCU per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
North Macedonia ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/trinidad-and-tobago/">North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.