Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mauritania
163,373 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
86,557 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
193rd
Zimbabwe rank
196th

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 163,373 current LCU per square kilometre against 86,557 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 76,816 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.9 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 60 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 193rd and Zimbabwe ranks 196th of 202 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 426.48 current LCU per square kilometre 0.792 current LCU per square kilometre 425.69 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 1,068 current LCU per square kilometre 1.86 current LCU per square kilometre 1,067 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 3,248 current LCU per square kilometre 3.66 current LCU per square kilometre 3,245 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 10,071 current LCU per square kilometre 3.59 current LCU per square kilometre 10,068 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 30,886 current LCU per square kilometre 3.81 current LCU per square kilometre 30,882 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 89,077 current LCU per square kilometre 26.67 current LCU per square kilometre 89,050 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 141,393 current LCU per square kilometre 23,645 current LCU per square kilometre 117,748 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
Mauritania, at 163,373 current LCU per square kilometre against 86,557 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
76,816 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 193rd and Zimbabwe ranks 196th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/">Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.