Iraq vs Uganda: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Iraq
355.86 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
387.99 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
19th
Uganda rank
16th

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iraq
  • Uganda
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 387.99 million current LCU per square kilometre against 355.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 32.13 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 16th of 202 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 915.59 current LCU per square kilometre 126.12 current LCU per square kilometre 789.47 current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 2,557 current LCU per square kilometre 357.58 current LCU per square kilometre 2,200 current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 15,754 current LCU per square kilometre 234,623 current LCU per square kilometre 218,870 current LCU per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 3.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.33 million current LCU per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 56.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 43.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.13 million current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 226.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 197.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.19 million current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 311.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 333.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 22.26 million current LCU per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Iraq or Uganda?
Uganda, at 387.99 million current LCU per square kilometre against 355.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Iraq and Uganda?
32.13 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uganda?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Uganda rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Iraq ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 16th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Uganda: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iraq/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iraq/uganda/">Iraq vs Uganda: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.