Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Greenland
34,055 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
86,557 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
199th
Zimbabwe rank
196th

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Greenland
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196419932023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 86,557 current LCU per square kilometre against 34,055 current LCU per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 52,502 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.5 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Greenland ahead.

Greenland ranks 199th and Zimbabwe ranks 196th of 202 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 18,720 current LCU per square kilometre 3.28 current LCU per square kilometre 18,717 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 25,380 current LCU per square kilometre 26.67 current LCU per square kilometre 25,353 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 31,952 current LCU per square kilometre 23,645 current LCU per square kilometre 8,308 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 86,557 current LCU per square kilometre against 34,055 current LCU per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
52,502 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Greenland ranks 199th and Zimbabwe ranks 196th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.