France vs South Africa: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

France
3.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
3.64 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
124th
South Africa rank
125th

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • France
  • South Africa
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 3.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.64 million current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 43,590 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 125th of 202 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 72,307 current LCU per square kilometre 4,295 current LCU per square kilometre 68,012 current LCU per square kilometre France
1970s 243,074 current LCU per square kilometre 13,278 current LCU per square kilometre 229,796 current LCU per square kilometre France
1980s 805,927 current LCU per square kilometre 62,766 current LCU per square kilometre 743,161 current LCU per square kilometre France
1990s 1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 290,541 current LCU per square kilometre 1.16 million current LCU per square kilometre France
2000s 2.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 944,810 current LCU per square kilometre 1.27 million current LCU per square kilometre France
2010s 2.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 577,803 current LCU per square kilometre France
2020s 3.39 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 80,968 current LCU per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, France or South Africa?
France, at 3.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.64 million current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between France and South Africa?
43,590 current LCU per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do France and South Africa rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
France ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 125th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs South Africa: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/south-africa/">France vs South Africa: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.