El Salvador vs New Zealand: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

El Salvador
974,160 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
154th
New Zealand rank
151st

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • New Zealand
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196519942023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 974,160 current LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 107,700 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 154th and New Zealand ranks 151st of 202 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 37,924 current LCU per square kilometre 25,530 current LCU per square kilometre 12,394 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 88,870 current LCU per square kilometre 104,650 current LCU per square kilometre 15,780 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 217,383 current LCU per square kilometre 215,106 current LCU per square kilometre 2,278 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 423,061 current LCU per square kilometre 384,930 current LCU per square kilometre 38,130 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 661,896 current LCU per square kilometre 632,853 current LCU per square kilometre 29,042 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 871,722 current LCU per square kilometre 957,752 current LCU per square kilometre 86,030 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, El Salvador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 974,160 current LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between El Salvador and New Zealand?
107,700 current LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Zealand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and New Zealand rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 154th and New Zealand ranks 151st of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs New Zealand: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-zealand/">El Salvador vs New Zealand: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.