Egypt vs Guatemala: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Egypt
5.27 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
116th
Guatemala rank
118th

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Guatemala
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 5.27 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 584,490 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Guatemala ahead.

Egypt ranks 116th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 202 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 963.06 current LCU per square kilometre 7,528 current LCU per square kilometre 6,565 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 2,576 current LCU per square kilometre 18,915 current LCU per square kilometre 16,339 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 18,724 current LCU per square kilometre 66,952 current LCU per square kilometre 48,228 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 94,763 current LCU per square kilometre 429,792 current LCU per square kilometre 335,029 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 269,204 current LCU per square kilometre 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 838,196 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.63 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 4.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 60,818 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Egypt or Guatemala?
Egypt, at 5.27 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Egypt and Guatemala?
584,490 current LCU per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Guatemala?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Guatemala rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 116th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Guatemala: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/guatemala/">Egypt vs Guatemala: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.