Chile vs Mauritius: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
218.23 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
206.91 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
24th
Mauritius rank
26th

Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 218.23 million current LCU per square kilometre against 206.91 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 11.32 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 26th of 202 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 315,267 current LCU per square kilometre 1.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.10 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 2.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 17.83 million current LCU per square kilometre 17.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 101,371 current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 48.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 59.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.95 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 118.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 137.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.70 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 186.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 178.78 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.28 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at 218.23 million current LCU per square kilometre against 206.91 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Mauritius?
11.32 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 26th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,097 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.