Russian Federation vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added

Russian Federation
61.01 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
61.87 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
16th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
15th

Services, value added over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
20.0T40.0T60.0T199020072025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 61.87 trillion constant LCU against 61.01 trillion constant LCU in Russian Federation, a difference of 860.10 billion constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 16th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 198 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 27.69 trillion constant LCU 11.51 trillion constant LCU 16.18 trillion constant LCU Russian Federation
2000s 33.93 trillion constant LCU 19.23 trillion constant LCU 14.71 trillion constant LCU Russian Federation
2010s 48.92 trillion constant LCU 36.82 trillion constant LCU 12.10 trillion constant LCU Russian Federation
2020s 56.49 trillion constant LCU 53.64 trillion constant LCU 2.85 trillion constant LCU Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added, Russian Federation or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 61.87 trillion constant LCU against 61.01 trillion constant LCU in Russian Federation as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added between Russian Federation and Tanzania, United Republic of?
860.10 billion constant LCU, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Russian Federation and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for services, value added?
Russian Federation ranks 16th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Services, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu/russian-federation/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu/russian-federation/tanzania/">Russian Federation vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 7,954 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.