Mexico vs Nepal: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Mexico
7.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
8.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
81st
Nepal rank
78th

Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Nepal
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196519942023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 8.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 7.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 78th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 187,503 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 1.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 876,033 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 4.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 5.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 6.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 437,469 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 7.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Mexico or Nepal?
Nepal, at 8.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 7.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Mexico and Nepal?
1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nepal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Nepal rank globally for services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 78th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Nepal: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/nepal/">Mexico vs Nepal: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,443 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.