India vs Malawi: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

India
44.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
43.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
45th
Malawi rank
47th

Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Malawi
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 44.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 43.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 474,900 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

India ranks 45th and Malawi ranks 47th of 195 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 1.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 1.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 3.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 6.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 13.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 27.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 33.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 39.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 42.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, India or Malawi?
India, at 44.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 43.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between India and Malawi?
474,900 constant LCU per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do India and Malawi rank globally for services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
India ranks 45th and Malawi ranks 47th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Malawi: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/malawi/">India vs Malawi: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,443 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.