Ecuador vs Latvia: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
278,423 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
337,324 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
167th
Latvia rank
164th

Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 337,324 constant LCU per square kilometre against 278,423 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 58,901 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 167th and Latvia ranks 164th of 195 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 101,673 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,712 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,038 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 132,219 constant LCU per square kilometre 210,894 constant LCU per square kilometre 78,675 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 223,470 constant LCU per square kilometre 276,689 constant LCU per square kilometre 53,219 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 259,888 constant LCU per square kilometre 321,604 constant LCU per square kilometre 61,717 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 337,324 constant LCU per square kilometre against 278,423 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Latvia?
58,901 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 167th and Latvia ranks 164th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,443 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.