Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Côte d'Ivoire
67.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
61.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire rank
33rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
35th

Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
20.0M40.0M60.0M199020062023

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 67.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 61.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 5.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 35th of 195 countries.

Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 38.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 27.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
2010s 48.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 41.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
2020s 62.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 56.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Côte d'Ivoire or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 67.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 61.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
5.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 35th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,443 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.