Belarus vs Finland: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
468,722 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
506,057 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
153rd
Finland rank
151st

Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Finland
200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k197519992023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 506,057 constant LCU per square kilometre against 468,722 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 37,335 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.

Belarus ranks 153rd and Finland ranks 151st of 195 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 192,686 constant LCU per square kilometre 303,162 constant LCU per square kilometre 110,476 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2000s 310,097 constant LCU per square kilometre 410,584 constant LCU per square kilometre 100,487 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2010s 449,365 constant LCU per square kilometre 453,644 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,279 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2020s 470,392 constant LCU per square kilometre 490,340 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,947 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Finland?
Finland, at 506,057 constant LCU per square kilometre against 468,722 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Finland?
37,335 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Finland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Finland rank globally for services, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 153rd and Finland ranks 151st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Finland: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/finland/">Belarus vs Finland: Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,443 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.