El Salvador vs Nepal: Services, value added

El Salvador
17.77 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Nepal
18.48 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
El Salvador rank
104th
Nepal rank
101st

Services, value added over time

  • El Salvador
  • Nepal
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B196519952025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 18.48 billion constant 2015 US$ against 17.77 billion constant 2015 US$ in El Salvador, a difference of 707.00 million constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 104th and Nepal ranks 101st of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 5.08 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.94 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.14 billion constant 2015 US$ El Salvador
1970s 7.09 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.03 billion constant 2015 US$ 5.06 billion constant 2015 US$ El Salvador
1980s 6.92 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.68 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.24 billion constant 2015 US$ El Salvador
1990s 8.97 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.60 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.37 billion constant 2015 US$ El Salvador
2000s 11.29 billion constant 2015 US$ 7.41 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.88 billion constant 2015 US$ El Salvador
2010s 13.90 billion constant 2015 US$ 12.19 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.71 billion constant 2015 US$ El Salvador
2020s 16.66 billion constant 2015 US$ 16.75 billion constant 2015 US$ 88.57 million constant 2015 US$ Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added, El Salvador or Nepal?
Nepal, at 18.48 billion constant 2015 US$ against 17.77 billion constant 2015 US$ in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added between El Salvador and Nepal?
707.00 million constant 2015 US$, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Nepal?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Nepal rank globally for services, value added?
El Salvador ranks 104th and Nepal ranks 101st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Nepal: Services, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us/el-salvador/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us/el-salvador/nepal/">El Salvador vs Nepal: Services, value added</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
238 places, 9,810 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defense, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.