How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?

56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malaysia vs Rwanda: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Malaysia

0.5371 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Rwanda

0.5363 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Malaysia rank

62nd

Rwanda rank

63rd

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Malaysia
Rwanda

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.5371 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5363 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0008 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Malaysia ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 63rd of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malaysia	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.5838 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.46 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.875 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1980s	0.4623 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5533 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.091 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1990s	0.5603 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5393 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.021 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2000s	0.5615 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5668 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0052 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2010s	0.4851 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.4958 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0107 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2020s	0.5473 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5186 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0287 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Malaysia or Rwanda?: Malaysia, at 0.5371 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5363 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Malaysia and Rwanda?: 0.0008 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Malaysia ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 63rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Rwanda: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malaysia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malaysia/rwanda/">Malaysia vs Rwanda: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 238 places, 9,768 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 31 August 2026

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.