Botswana vs South Korea: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP (unit GDP)

Botswana
0.5994 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Korea
0.5965 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Botswana rank
35th
South Korea rank
36th

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP (unit GDP) over time

  • Botswana
  • South Korea
0246196019922025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.5994 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5965 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in South Korea, a difference of 0.0029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Korea ahead.

Botswana ranks 35th and South Korea ranks 36th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 3.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 5.02 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Korea
1970s 1.1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.7 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.6 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Korea
1980s 0.5688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.15 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5794 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Korea
1990s 0.5971 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7172 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1201 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Korea
2000s 0.5637 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6852 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1216 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Korea
2010s 0.521 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5542 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0331 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP South Korea
2020s 0.5853 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5718 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0135 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Botswana or South Korea?
Botswana, at 0.5994 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5965 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in South Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Botswana and South Korea?
0.0029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Korea?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Botswana and South Korea rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Botswana ranks 35th and South Korea ranks 36th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs South Korea: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/korea-rep/">Botswana vs South Korea: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,768 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.