Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Tanzania, United Republic of
31,057 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
30,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
163rd
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k196919962023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 31,057 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 30,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 137 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 6,531 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 10,907 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,477 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 20,889 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 28,580 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 202.1 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 31,057 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 30,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
137 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
236 places, 9,217 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.