Norway vs Sri Lanka: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Norway
742,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
862,955 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
65th
Sri Lanka rank
62nd

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Sri Lanka
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 862,955 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 742,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 120,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 187,554 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 78,833 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 108,720 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 269,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 137,903 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 132,017 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 357,331 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 222,526 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 490,476 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 378,584 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 111,892 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 618,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 715,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 96,236 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 707,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 863,688 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 156,676 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Norway or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 862,955 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 742,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Norway and Sri Lanka?
120,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Sri Lanka rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Sri Lanka: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/sri-lanka/">Norway vs Sri Lanka: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
236 places, 9,217 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.