Norway vs Panama: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Norway
742,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
702,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
65th
Panama rank
67th

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Panama
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 742,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 702,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 40,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 65th and Panama ranks 67th of 193 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Panama Difference Ahead
1970s 187,554 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,985 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 112,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 269,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 122,476 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 147,444 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 357,331 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 158,620 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 198,712 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 490,476 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 267,569 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 222,907 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 618,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 497,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 121,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 707,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 624,367 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 82,644 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Norway or Panama?
Norway, at 742,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 702,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Norway and Panama?
40,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Panama?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Panama rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 65th and Panama ranks 67th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Panama: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/panama/">Norway vs Panama: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
236 places, 9,217 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.