New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

New Zealand
576,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Viet Nam
528,305 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
71st
Viet Nam rank
73rd

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Viet Nam
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197720002023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 576,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 528,305 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Viet Nam, a difference of 47,723 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 71st and Viet Nam ranks 73rd of 193 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1980s 193,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,716 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 144,492 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 230,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 91,563 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 138,542 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 336,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 182,657 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 153,902 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 443,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 318,562 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 124,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 548,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 477,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 71,611 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, New Zealand or Viet Nam?
New Zealand, at 576,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 528,305 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Viet Nam as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between New Zealand and Viet Nam?
47,723 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Viet Nam?
39 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Viet Nam rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 71st and Viet Nam ranks 73rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/viet-nam/">New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
236 places, 9,217 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.