East Asia & Pacific vs Singapore: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
735,572 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
376.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
4th
Singapore rank
2nd

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Singapore
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 376.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 735,572 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 375.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 511.4 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 43 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 197,098 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 98.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 98.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 315,069 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 172.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 172.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 516,355 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 293.39 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 292.87 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 686,213 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 354.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 353.55 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Singapore?
Singapore, at 376.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 735,572 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Singapore?
375.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Singapore?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Singapore rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Singapore: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/singapore/">East Asia & Pacific vs Singapore: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
236 places, 9,217 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.