Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
29,110 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
30,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
166th
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k196919962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 30,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 29,110 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 193 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 2,496 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,119 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,623 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 4,484 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,026 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,542 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 6,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 10,625 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,477 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,852 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 18,881 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 27,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 30,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 29,110 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
1,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
236 places, 9,217 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.