Eswatini vs Latin America & Caribbean: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate

Eswatini
6.17 % change on previous year
in 2025
Latin America & Caribbean
2.38 % change on previous year
in 2025
Eswatini rank
34th
Latin America & Caribbean rank
37th

Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Latin America & Caribbean
-20-100102030197119982025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 6.17 % change on previous year against 2.38 % change on previous year in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 3.79 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.6 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 34th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 37th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Latin America & Caribbean in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Latin America & Caribbean Difference Ahead
1970s 7.19 % change on previous year 6.84 % change on previous year 0.3449 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 4.33 % change on previous year 2.87 % change on previous year 1.47 % change on previous year Eswatini
1990s 6.89 % change on previous year 3.03 % change on previous year 3.86 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 2.63 % change on previous year 3.21 % change on previous year 0.5852 % change on previous year Latin America & Caribbean
2010s 3.04 % change on previous year 2.56 % change on previous year 0.4788 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 3.03 % change on previous year 2.07 % change on previous year 0.9629 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added (constant 2015 us$), annual growth rate, Eswatini or Latin America & Caribbean?
Eswatini, at 6.17 % change on previous year against 2.38 % change on previous year in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added (constant 2015 us$), annual growth rate between Eswatini and Latin America & Caribbean?
3.79 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Latin America & Caribbean?
54 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Latin America & Caribbean rank globally for services, value added (constant 2015 us$), annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 34th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 37th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Latin America & Caribbean: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/latin-america-and-caribbean/">Eswatini vs Latin America & Caribbean: Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,572 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Services, value added (constant 2015 US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.