East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Services, value added

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
5.4%
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
10.9%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th

Services, value added over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Kyrgyzstan
-2002040197920022025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 10.9% against 5.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 5.5%.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 2.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 43 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 4 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1980s 9.3% 5.7% 3.7% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 8.3% -0.7% 9.0% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 10.2% 7.6% 2.6% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 8.0% 3.8% 4.2% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 5.1% 5.8% 0.7% Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher services, value added, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 10.9% against 5.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in services, value added between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan?
5.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan?
38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for services, value added?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Services, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Services, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/services-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/kyrgyz-republic/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Services, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Services, value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
242 places, 9,649 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Services industries correspond to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 45-99 and includes wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, public administration and defence, compulsory social security, education, health and social work, other community, social and personal service activities, private households with employed persons, and extra-territorial organizations and bodies. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.