Singapore vs Switzerland: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector over time
- Singapore
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 0.2212 Index against 0.2128 Index in Singapore, a difference of 0.0084 Index.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Switzerland ahead.
Singapore ranks 21st and Switzerland ranks 20th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.201 Index | 0.212 Index | 0.011 Index | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0.2273 Index | 0.2141 Index | 0.0133 Index | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector, Singapore or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 0.2212 Index against 0.2128 Index in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector between Singapore and Switzerland?
- 0.0084 Index, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Switzerland?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Singapore and Switzerland rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector?
- Singapore ranks 21st and Switzerland ranks 20th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025