Indonesia vs Kazakhstan: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector over time
- Indonesia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.3331 Index against 0.3228 Index in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0103 Index.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 4th and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3417 Index | 0.3226 Index | 0.0191 Index | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.3393 Index | 0.3437 Index | 0.0044 Index | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector, Indonesia or Kazakhstan?
- Indonesia, at 0.3331 Index against 0.3228 Index in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector between Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0103 Index, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Indonesia and Kazakhstan rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector?
- Indonesia ranks 4th and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025