Lithuania vs United Kingdom: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector over time
- Lithuania
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0849 Index against 0.0707 Index in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0142 Index.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times United Kingdom's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Lithuania ranks 6th and United Kingdom ranks 8th of 11 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0731 Index | 0.1202 Index | 0.0471 Index | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 0.0849 Index | 0.0801 Index | 0.0047 Index | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector, Lithuania or United Kingdom?
- Lithuania, at 0.0849 Index against 0.0707 Index in United Kingdom as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector between Lithuania and United Kingdom?
- 0.0142 Index, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and United Kingdom?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and United Kingdom rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector?
- Lithuania ranks 6th and United Kingdom ranks 8th of 11 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Restrictions to movement of people. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025