Lithuania vs Viet Nam: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector over time
- Lithuania
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 0.1062 Index against 0.0354 Index in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0708 Index.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 3.0 times Lithuania's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 11 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0275 Index | 0.1062 Index | 0.0787 Index | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 0.0354 Index | 0.1062 Index | 0.0708 Index | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector, Lithuania or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 0.1062 Index against 0.0354 Index in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector between Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 0.0708 Index, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Viet Nam rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector?
- Lithuania ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 11 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Restrictions on foreign entry. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025