Korea vs Lithuania: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector over time
- Korea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Korea currently reports 0.0708 Index against 0.0354 Index in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0354 Index.
That makes Korea's figure about 2.0 times Lithuania's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 4th of 11 groups.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0806 Index | 0.0275 Index | 0.0531 Index | Korea |
| 2020s | 0.0669 Index | 0.0354 Index | 0.0315 Index | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector, Korea or Lithuania?
- Korea, at 0.0708 Index against 0.0354 Index in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector between Korea and Lithuania?
- 0.0354 Index, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Lithuania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Korea and Lithuania rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector?
- Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 4th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Restrictions on foreign entry. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025