Lithuania vs Luxembourg: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Regulatory
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Regulatory over time
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.0839 Index against 0.0336 Index in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0503 Index.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.5 times Lithuania's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 11 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0336 Index | 0.0839 Index | 0.0504 Index | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.0336 Index | 0.0839 Index | 0.0504 Index | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — regulatory, Lithuania or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.0839 Index against 0.0336 Index in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — regulatory between Lithuania and Luxembourg?
- 0.0503 Index, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Luxembourg?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Luxembourg rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — regulatory?
- Lithuania ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Regulatory transparency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025