China vs Indonesia: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Regulatory
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Regulatory over time
- China
- Indonesia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.0168 Index against 0.0168 Index in Indonesia, a difference of 0 Index.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was China ahead.
China ranks 30th and Indonesia ranks 30th of 39 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0196 Index | 0 Index | 0.0196 Index | China |
| 2020s | 0.0504 Index | 0.0112 Index | 0.0392 Index | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — regulatory, China or Indonesia?
- China, at 0.0168 Index against 0.0168 Index in Indonesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — regulatory between China and Indonesia?
- 0 Index, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Indonesia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do China and Indonesia rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — regulatory?
- China ranks 30th and Indonesia ranks 30th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Regulatory transparency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025