Latvia vs Philippines: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Other
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Other over time
- Latvia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.0553 Index against 0.0277 Index in Latvia, a difference of 0.0276 Index.
That makes Philippines's figure about 2.0 times Latvia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 4th and Philippines ranks 3rd of 11 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0184 Index | 0.0553 Index | 0.0369 Index | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0.0246 Index | 0.0553 Index | 0.0307 Index | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — other, Latvia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 0.0553 Index against 0.0277 Index in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — other between Latvia and Philippines?
- 0.0276 Index, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Philippines?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Philippines rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — other?
- Latvia ranks 4th and Philippines ranks 3rd of 11 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Other discriminatory measures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025