Brazil vs Latvia: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Other
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Other over time
- Brazil
- Latvia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0645 Index against 0.0277 Index in Latvia, a difference of 0.0368 Index.
That makes Brazil's figure about 2.3 times Latvia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 4th of 39 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0645 Index | 0.0184 Index | 0.0461 Index | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0645 Index | 0.0246 Index | 0.0399 Index | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — other, Brazil or Latvia?
- Brazil, at 0.0645 Index against 0.0277 Index in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — other between Brazil and Latvia?
- 0.0368 Index, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Latvia rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — other?
- Brazil ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 4th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Other discriminatory measures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025