Korea vs Lithuania: Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Barriers to
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Barriers to over time
- Korea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Korea currently reports 0.0091 Index against 0.0091 Index in Lithuania, a difference of 0 Index.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 11 groups.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0091 Index | 0.0091 Index | 0 Index | — |
| 2020s | 0.0091 Index | 0.0091 Index | 0 Index | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — barriers to, Korea or Lithuania?
- Korea, at 0.0091 Index against 0.0091 Index in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — barriers to between Korea and Lithuania?
- 0 Index, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Lithuania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Korea and Lithuania rank globally for services trade restrictiveness index by services sector — barriers to?
- Korea ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Services Trade Restrictiveness Index by services sector — Barriers to competition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The OECD STRI is a unique, evidence-based tool that collects information on services trade restrictions across 22 services sectors. The project has two distinct but complementary instruments: a services trade regulatory database and a services trade restrictiveness index. Based on the qualitative information in the database, composite indices quantify the identified restrictions across five standard policy categories, with values between zero and one. Complete openness to trade and investment gives a score of zero, while being completely closed to foreign services providers yields a score of one. This dataset presents a breakdown by economic activity at group- (3-digit) level of International Standard Industrial Classification, Revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4): ISIC Rev. 4. A zip file containing the STRI indices for all countries and sectors available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD STRI 2025